Best way to deal with minor edits

Question

My feelings say : it is not the right time ... but my brain says : it is the right time ! to post.

Last night, the suggested review queue hits more than usual number. I observed a (new)user doing all the edits and all are with eos --> elementary OS. (I approved all the edits except one or two). I considered the above case as an example for better understanding, Please never mind.

My question:

What should be correct choice, if the post is too minor and If there are other things that could be "corrected" ?

Minor: Definition of the word "minor" varies widely.

Here are some instances I will mention:

• Removing only "Thanks"

• changing only eos --> elementary OS

• Also minor as defined here

I remember I have posted similar post on other SE site.

---

Here are my references from main meta:

Is correcting a common misspelling too minor an edit?

Does Stack Exchange have an official stance on users doing a large number of trivial edits to old questions?

---

From help center edit questions:

Tiny, trivial edits are discouraged - try to make the post significantly better when you edit, correcting all problems that you observe.

---

EDIT:

I have posted this question: To link this post as reasons for rejection in custom message, but not to belabour the point :)

Answer 1

I understand and know that SE discourages minor edits, but to me if they are a clear improvement - approve them.

Obviously if the editor could have made further changes, then you should improve them. If the change is not useful or is meaningless - such as if it's eOS to elementary OS, then you should probably reject.

This is one of those things that doesn't take a lot of discussion/belabouring in my opinion.